| 1 |
Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>>dev.gentoo.org:/space/distfiles-local |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
> 3. developer uploads patch to dev.gentoo.org:/space/patches-local and |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
>I don't see a reason to separate patches from distfiles. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
I think my english is bad, tell if you don't understand what I want to |
| 13 |
say :/ |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I think that it's not to separate patch from distfiles (a lot are |
| 16 |
already avaible) but to have a emerge sync faster and less bandwith |
| 17 |
consumer. |
| 18 |
many many patch are on sync server, many are not apply due to proc |
| 19 |
architecture or USE flag. |
| 20 |
Thoses patch that are on distfiles server aren't necessary download like |
| 21 |
on sync |
| 22 |
I think that it can be a way to take for futur. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Like an other thing (for bandwith use) : if an update of a pacquet is |
| 25 |
avaible : why download are the new sources instead of just a patch ? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Beber |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
/* Beber : beber (AT) setibzh (DOT) com |
| 31 |
* https://guybrush.ath.cx |
| 32 |
* Using Mozilla Thunderbird on Gentoo Linux |
| 33 |
* Rachel @ friends.paris |
| 34 |
*/ |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives