| 1 |
Mike Bonar wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 23 October 2006 10:26, Duncan wrote: |
| 3 |
>> "Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?q?Petten=C3=B2?=" <flameeyes@g.o> posted |
| 4 |
>> 200610231616.50546@××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××.org, excerpted below, on |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:16:50 +0200: |
| 7 |
>>> Probably not covered everything, I left Mr_Bones_ and jakub to run a |
| 8 |
>>> check for me afterward, unfortunately identifying every and all the |
| 9 |
>>> packages on the first run was pretty impossible -considering also there |
| 10 |
>>> are packages with unstated dependencies, like two XFCE4 packages- I'll |
| 11 |
>>> mask and notify about anything else that might come up as soona s they |
| 12 |
>>> can give me the data. |
| 13 |
>> I don't suppose it's possible to let amarok continue to use all those xmms |
| 14 |
>> visualizations, is it? It'd be nice... |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> -- |
| 17 |
>> Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 18 |
>> "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 19 |
>> and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
| 20 |
> Removing xmms breaks amarok, at least for me. I had to recompile xine-lib |
| 21 |
> without the xmms use flag to get amarok to play music again. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Glide |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Yes that will happen in many situations; anything that depends on xmms |
| 26 |
libs will need to be rebuilt without them ;) |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives