| 1 |
On 10 Jun 2008, at 18:39, Doug Goldstein wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
| 4 |
>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Patrick Lauer |
| 5 |
>> <bugs@××××××××××××××××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>>> So EAPI 2 is not "everything shiny", but a small iterative |
| 8 |
>>> improvement to |
| 9 |
>>> EAPI 1. |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>>> Suggest features then and let's discuss! |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> For reference of existing ideas -- https://bugs.gentoo.org/174380 |
| 15 |
>> -- a |
| 16 |
>> tracker for EAPI feature requests. |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> I personally like https://bugs.gentoo.org/197859 the most -- split |
| 19 |
>> out |
| 20 |
>> src_configure from src_compile which will allow sane resuming of |
| 21 |
>> compiles :) |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
> At this point, we should really only discuss features that all 3 |
| 25 |
> package managers have implemented. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
I'm not sure this intersection isn't empty :/ |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
We might, however, only discuss features that all 3 package managers |
| 30 |
can implement easily. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
- ferdy |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives