1 |
Fernando J. Pereda wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On 10 Jun 2008, at 18:39, Doug Goldstein wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
6 |
>>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Patrick Lauer |
7 |
>>> <bugs@××××××××××××××××××××××.org> wrote: |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>>>> So EAPI 2 is not "everything shiny", but a small iterative |
10 |
>>>> improvement to |
11 |
>>>> EAPI 1. |
12 |
>>>> |
13 |
>>>> Suggest features then and let's discuss! |
14 |
>>>> |
15 |
>>> |
16 |
>>> For reference of existing ideas -- https://bugs.gentoo.org/174380 -- a |
17 |
>>> tracker for EAPI feature requests. |
18 |
>>> |
19 |
>>> I personally like https://bugs.gentoo.org/197859 the most -- split out |
20 |
>>> src_configure from src_compile which will allow sane resuming of |
21 |
>>> compiles :) |
22 |
>>> |
23 |
>>> |
24 |
>> At this point, we should really only discuss features that all 3 |
25 |
>> package managers have implemented. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> I'm not sure this intersection isn't empty :/ |
28 |
> |
29 |
> We might, however, only discuss features that all 3 package managers |
30 |
> can implement easily. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> - ferdy |
33 |
> |
34 |
That's more of what I meant. |
35 |
-- |
36 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |