1 |
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 9:16 AM, Tobias Scherbaum <dertobi123@g.o>wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Mark Loeser wrote: |
4 |
> > I personally don't see why they should be allowed to stay part of our |
5 |
> > communication channels where they have caused problems bad enough to get |
6 |
> > them retired. With that being said, I think the same technical issues |
7 |
> > come into play here as with banning someone from "Gentoo" entirely. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I agree on this. I'd limit this ban to channels where they have caused |
10 |
> problems though (or channels which they've been taking part of), banning |
11 |
> them on each and every #gentoo-* channel is just an unnecessary overhead |
12 |
> imho. And for the given technical restrictions they'd be banned as |
13 |
> suggested, when they are coming back using another IP or another nick |
14 |
> the same rules would apply as for every other user - warning and ban if |
15 |
> they're misbehaving. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> > I am not sure how we would be able to enforce this across the board for |
18 |
> > forcefully retired developers. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> It's not really possible without some huge work overhead to fully ban |
21 |
> someone - therefore given limitations as described above would apply. |
22 |
> Everything else is not doable from my pov. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Tobias |
25 |
> |
26 |
|
27 |
Although it isn't feasible in practice, such a policy would allow us to |
28 |
defenestrate forcefully retired developers that keep coming back to mailing |
29 |
lists or channels with the same attitude that got then kicked, without |
30 |
having to resort to long process and waste of our human resources. We |
31 |
wouldn't have to go through the same process over and over again: if |
32 |
somebody was retired and keeps doing the same things as when was a |
33 |
developer, then people in charge of channels or mailing lists might take |
34 |
instant action as they find it necessary. If they get a new attitude after |
35 |
retired, I'm sure that the people in charge will not take the extra work to |
36 |
ban them for nothing. |
37 |
|
38 |
My R$ 0.02. |
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
Pilla |