| 1 |
Mark Loeser wrote: |
| 2 |
> I personally don't see why they should be allowed to stay part of our |
| 3 |
> communication channels where they have caused problems bad enough to get |
| 4 |
> them retired. With that being said, I think the same technical issues |
| 5 |
> come into play here as with banning someone from "Gentoo" entirely. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I agree on this. I'd limit this ban to channels where they have caused |
| 8 |
problems though (or channels which they've been taking part of), banning |
| 9 |
them on each and every #gentoo-* channel is just an unnecessary overhead |
| 10 |
imho. And for the given technical restrictions they'd be banned as |
| 11 |
suggested, when they are coming back using another IP or another nick |
| 12 |
the same rules would apply as for every other user - warning and ban if |
| 13 |
they're misbehaving. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> I am not sure how we would be able to enforce this across the board for |
| 16 |
> forcefully retired developers. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
It's not really possible without some huge work overhead to fully ban |
| 19 |
someone - therefore given limitations as described above would apply. |
| 20 |
Everything else is not doable from my pov. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Tobias |
Archives