| 1 |
Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o> said: |
| 2 |
> 2) Continued presence of forcefully retired devs |
| 3 |
> It really baffles me that some developers are forcefully retired for |
| 4 |
> anti-social behavior, but are not consequently banned from the places |
| 5 |
> where they display this behavior, such as our MLs and IRC channels. What |
| 6 |
> good is it to retire developers, but allow them to continue to be |
| 7 |
> disruptive? I would like the Council to decide for a change in our |
| 8 |
> policy on this point. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I personally don't see why they should be allowed to stay part of our |
| 11 |
communication channels where they have caused problems bad enough to get |
| 12 |
them retired. With that being said, I think the same technical issues |
| 13 |
come into play here as with banning someone from "Gentoo" entirely. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I am not sure how we would be able to enforce this across the board for |
| 16 |
forcefully retired developers. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Mark Loeser |
| 20 |
email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org |
| 21 |
email - mark AT halcy0n DOT com |
| 22 |
web - http://www.halcy0n.com |
Archives