| 1 |
On Tuesday 19 August 2008, Mark Loeser wrote: |
| 2 |
> I am not sure how we would be able to enforce this across the board |
| 3 |
> for forcefully retired developers. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
If we are talking policies, can someone please define the |
| 6 |
term 'forecefully retired'? What about people whom had been complained |
| 7 |
about to devrel, and who then resigned? Does it include people who are |
| 8 |
retired due to inactivity? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
What benifit does this proposal have over an enforcement of the CoC on |
| 11 |
retired developers? If they choose to stay part of our community, any |
| 12 |
misbehaviour can also be penalized using that document. If they choose |
| 13 |
to stay and contribute properly, why ban them? I'm happy about all bugs |
| 14 |
I get, even by the most evil compile persons. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Robert |
Archives