Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: George Shapovalov <george@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4?
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 08:00:56
Message-Id: 200606210957.18804.george@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4? by "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò"
1 середа, 21. червень 2006 03:46, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò Ви написали:
2 > On Wednesday 21 June 2006 03:34, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
3 > > OK, so we can add qt3 to make.defaults.
4 > -* says nothing to you? :)
5 Now I am confused:
6 My understanding of that proposal was that qt3 is meant to mean "prefer qt3
7 over qt4", rather than "enable qt3 unconditionally and see what can be done
8 about qt4". So which one is that?
9 If it is former (preference flag) I do not see aproblem there:
10 -qt +qt3 = -qt in such reading.
11 So, basically the question is about interpretation of -qt +qt3 construct..
12
13 George
14
15 --
16 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4? Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4? Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>