| 1 |
On Sun, 2017-05-07 at 22:24 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> I'm against. Turning more arches into dev/exp only introduces hidden |
| 3 |
> depgraph breakages. I think it'd be better if we looked into |
| 4 |
> the arch.desc proposal and just disabled stable keywords for those |
| 5 |
> architectures. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
This is probably the smaller problem. The link shows a bug where none |
| 9 |
of the aforementioned arch teams have keyworded the requested packages |
| 10 |
in 4 months. How would the arches.desc proposal fix "dead arch teams"? |
| 11 |
Sure, it will make maintenance easier for pure stablereqs, but the |
| 12 |
other half of keywording does not happen. All the ia64/ppc/sparc |
| 13 |
KEYWORDREQs I have filed for sci-* packages I have closed and |
| 14 |
dekeyworded for revdeps. We have had KEYWORDREQs open for over a year |
| 15 |
with 0 activity. If the keywording inactivity continues, I will also |
| 16 |
continue to dekeyword packages. |
Archives