| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Brian D. Harring wrote: |
| 5 |
| Essentially it's squashing old noise on the bugs till we can actually |
| 6 |
| address it. Like I said above, two main thrusts of work are stable, |
| 7 |
| and mangling the codebase so that we can actually pull this stuff off, |
| 8 |
| and with the limited # of people hacking on portage, more time devoted |
| 9 |
| to that the better. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I definitely share your feeling on the limited number of people. But |
| 12 |
what I think this will do is (1) nothing about the noise from bugs; |
| 13 |
people will still post on them if it's LATER, and (2) produce a bunch of |
| 14 |
dupes from people who are only searching for open bugs. So in my mind, |
| 15 |
it has all the benefits of simply classifying enhancements correctly |
| 16 |
plus the downside of actually creating more work. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Best of luck with it, though. Keep us posted on how it works. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Donnie |
| 21 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 22 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
iD8DBQFC6R4xXVaO67S1rtsRArbRAJ9CtEm7RvdjFFYBAd+0qlv0lTv3FQCfcLCA |
| 25 |
bocASAAm08kY7uuJ7pA6zcc= |
| 26 |
=AOCP |
| 27 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives