1 |
On Saturday 05 August 2006 06:57, Kevin F. Quinn wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 11:49:53 +0200 |
3 |
> Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> > Please re-read the list of packages that fail tests: |
5 |
> > * glibc |
6 |
> > * autoconf |
7 |
> > * gettext |
8 |
> > * tar |
9 |
> > That makes _4_ system packages. Before I would consider making |
10 |
> > FEATURES=test a default, I would add least want the system set to |
11 |
> > actually merge with it. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> So you're happy to let users install these packages without them |
14 |
> knowing the tests would fail? |
15 |
|
16 |
before i added binutils-2.17, i ran `make check` on it for about 25 |
17 |
targets ... of those, about 10 failed ... |
18 |
|
19 |
i checked with upstream and others reproduced it ... i dont know about you, |
20 |
but i dont have the skills to go in and fix the failures for all of those |
21 |
architectures |
22 |
|
23 |
while i like the idea of all packages being able to pass FEATURES=test, |
24 |
somethings it just aint gonna happen with Gentoo's available skill set |
25 |
-mike |