Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Igor <lanthruster@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Question, Portage QOS
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 16:48:47
Message-Id: 52d02460.431c980a.17aa.ffffad03@mx.google.com
Hello All,

Thank you for all our feedback!

It's very good that we have all many different views on the same
subject. The nature designed us in a way that some part of us is
to survive in almost any situation. If everyone thought the same
they would make the same decisions and the probability of survival
would decrease. So it's all very natural and I didn't expect it
going easy.

In project like that I can't rush to programming it without
everyone's approval. This part of the project should have been
implemented with the first portage version by it's creator. But as
I'm not this person I'll need the expertise of the whole community.


Let's agree on following - I'll design the system in details on paper.
When it's ready (~ 1.5 months) I'll get back here and share the details.

Then we all review it again everyone could contribute it's own view
and part and help to avoid some design problems if there are.

And then when the final version is ready and there is support and
understanding of everyone and everyone says YES and sees that system
could be helpful - I'll get in running in ~ 1.5 years alone or if
I find some help - faster. I would anyway need this design to
effectively program the soft. It's the first step, no matter if
there is the second.

Do we have an agreement on this one from everyone of the list?

Please vote.

-- 
Best regards,
 Igor                          mailto:lanthruster@×××××.com

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Question, Portage QOS Jon Portnoy <avenj@××××××××××××××.us>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Question, Portage QOS Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Question, Portage QOS Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Question, Portage QOS Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o>