| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004, Lars Weiler wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> When security requested a bump. And to extend this, also |
| 7 |
> packages where the maintainer requests a bump without a |
| 8 |
> security-reason. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I'll second this motion. I've asked this a few times before but the |
| 11 |
general consensus is that people do not want to do work that while |
| 12 |
inconveniences them, saves time for a lot more people. However there are |
| 13 |
some folks who are kind enough to provide test cases, and to them I am |
| 14 |
very grateful :) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
If and when QA becomes a more serious force than it is now, I think this |
| 17 |
should be something to be considered to be added to the list of "stuff you |
| 18 |
need to do as a Gentoo package maintainer". |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
- -- |
| 21 |
Jason Wever |
| 22 |
Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead |
| 23 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 24 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
iD8DBQFBKCdTdKvgdVioq28RAgKhAJsFvkUZ7+JrFbFVawU/YWXYX4BHGwCfXoWH |
| 27 |
KumijjdxUJN2oNM8k1c7OZo= |
| 28 |
=PTbd |
| 29 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives