| 1 |
On Saturday 21 August 2004 11:55 pm, Jason Wever wrote: |
| 2 |
> I'll second this motion. I've asked this a few times before but the |
| 3 |
> general consensus is that people do not want to do work that while |
| 4 |
> inconveniences them, saves time for a lot more people. However there are |
| 5 |
> some folks who are kind enough to provide test cases, and to them I am |
| 6 |
> very grateful :) |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> If and when QA becomes a more serious force than it is now, I think this |
| 9 |
> should be something to be considered to be added to the list of "stuff you |
| 10 |
> need to do as a Gentoo package maintainer". |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> -- |
| 13 |
> Jason Wever |
| 14 |
> Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I like this too. A request for a bump for security reasons should include a |
| 17 |
test case so that the arch maintainer can verify the fix worked. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Jason Huebel |
| 21 |
Gentoo/amd64 Strategic Lead |
| 22 |
Gentoo Developer Relations/Recruiter |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
GPG Public Key: |
| 25 |
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9BA9E230 |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
"Do not weep; do not wax indignant. Understand." |
| 28 |
Baruch Spinoza (1632 - 1677) |
Archives