Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: hasufell <hasufell@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles?
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 22:35:27
Message-Id: 538E4DA1.9030707@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? by Tom Wijsman
1 Tom Wijsman:
2 > On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 20:58:46 +0200
3 > Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote:
4 >
5 >> On Fri, 30 May 2014 19:17:31 +0200
6 >> Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> wrote:
7 >>
8 >>> On Fri, 30 May 2014 18:14:11 +0100
9 >>> Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote:
10 >>>> A more reasonable approach would be for the Council to permit the
11 >>>> tree to contain at most 6 wrong lines at any given time. That way
12 >>>> any developer wishing to add a new wrong line must previously fix
13 >>>> an existing wrong line.
14 >>>
15 >>> You can suggest that to the Gentoo Council by replying to the
16 >>> Council agenda thread on the gentoo-project mailing list.
17 >>
18 >> whooosh
19 >>
20 >>
21 >> jer
22 >>
23 >
24 > boom splat
25 >
26
27 Stop spamming and stop telling obvious things. We can write a bot that
28 gives that kind of information.

Replies