Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: hasufell@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles?
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 23:14:47
Message-Id: 20140604011337.266c9a36@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? by hasufell
1 On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 22:35:13 +0000
2 hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > Tom Wijsman:
5 > > On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 20:58:46 +0200
6 > > Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote:
7 > >
8 > >> On Fri, 30 May 2014 19:17:31 +0200
9 > >> Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> wrote:
10 > >>
11 > >>> On Fri, 30 May 2014 18:14:11 +0100
12 > >>> Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote:
13 > >>>> A more reasonable approach would be for the Council to permit the
14 > >>>> tree to contain at most 6 wrong lines at any given time. That way
15 > >>>> any developer wishing to add a new wrong line must previously fix
16 > >>>> an existing wrong line.
17 > >>>
18 > >>> You can suggest that to the Gentoo Council by replying to the
19 > >>> Council agenda thread on the gentoo-project mailing list.
20 > >>
21 > >> whooosh
22 > >>
23 > >>
24 > >> jer
25 > >>
26 > >
27 > > boom splat
28 > >
29 >
30 > Stop spamming and stop telling obvious things. We can write a bot that
31 > gives that kind of information.
32
33 We can also write a bot that points out that it is "nonsense", "doesn't
34 matter" and "breakage" as in your original response to this sub thread.
35
36 Can you instead tell us what you think makes sense, matters and works?
37
38 In this case, for me; whooosh boom splat makes sense, matters and works.
39
40 --
41 With kind regards,
42
43 Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
44 Gentoo Developer
45
46 E-mail address : TomWij@g.o
47 GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
48 GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature