| 1 |
Brian Harring wrote: |
| 2 |
> Question your method of bootstraping then- note that for gcc it's |
| 3 |
> nocxx, not cxx. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Meaning, USE=nocxx _disables_ building cxx; this is why default IUSE |
| 6 |
> is requested, to kill off the 'no' (and it's seperate from my point)- |
| 7 |
> c++ related failures there would be due to either |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Sorry, lack of thinking on my part. Was actually USE="-* minimal nocxx |
| 10 |
pam", which is significantly different and therefore not related to the |
| 11 |
use.force discussion. Sorry for wasting your bandwidth. |
| 12 |
-- |
| 13 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives