1 |
On 03/15/2017 08:12 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 19:55:44 -0400 |
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
> |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Agreed, but I was under the impression that sometimes sec. team was |
8 |
> waiting for cleanup to close a bug. If you've just done the analysis |
9 |
> that it is the only thing left, just do it and close the bug, instead |
10 |
> of pinging on the bug and re-do that analysis in a later pass. This |
11 |
> reduces context switches and makes everything more efficient :) |
12 |
> |
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
Indeed, although it should be noted that the amount of context switches |
16 |
is reduced by using whiteboards to tag status along with version |
17 |
information in summary, which is why it is important they follow |
18 |
security team policies for security bugs. |
19 |
|
20 |
In particular the whiteboard status allows for effective filtering when |
21 |
creating work-lists to reduce context switching (so if you're a |
22 |
maintainer starting a stablereq, feel free to update whiteboard from |
23 |
ebuild to stable!) |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
27 |
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net |
28 |
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 |