Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Bug â„–504116, /etc/init.d/functions.sh
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 18:42:34
Message-Id: 20141221184223.GA19771@linux1
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Bug â„–504116, /etc/init.d/functions.sh by Rich Freeman
1 On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 11:39:20AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
2 > On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 10:40 AM, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote:
3 > > On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 03:15:48PM +0300, Сергей wrote:
4 > >> Today two bugs from 504116's dependencies were resolved and two other
5 > >> bugs were removed from 504116's dependencies list. Thanks to
6 > >> maintainers who decided to solve the problem!
7 > >
8 > > The bugs being resolved is good, but I'm concerned about the bugs that
9 > > were *removed* from the dependencies list.
10 > >
11 > > Why were they removed rather than being resolved?
12 > >
13 >
14 > See mgorny's comment in the bug:
15 > Removing bugs for maintainer-use scripts. We need not to care about those.
16
17 Ok, that makes sense.
18
19 William

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature