Archives
Archives
| From: | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Bug â„–504116, /etc/init.d/functions.sh | ||
| Date: | Sun, 21 Dec 2014 16:39:27 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAGfcS_ndz1c+Mm1imcKZhe3=4O+ALBYws=0jSD-0CY-kt=a=kw@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Bug №504116, /etc/init.d/functions.sh by William Hubbs |
||
| 1 | On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 10:40 AM, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 03:15:48PM +0300, Сергей wrote: |
| 3 | >> Today two bugs from 504116's dependencies were resolved and two other |
| 4 | >> bugs were removed from 504116's dependencies list. Thanks to |
| 5 | >> maintainers who decided to solve the problem! |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > The bugs being resolved is good, but I'm concerned about the bugs that |
| 8 | > were *removed* from the dependencies list. |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | > Why were they removed rather than being resolved? |
| 11 | > |
| 12 | |
| 13 | See mgorny's comment in the bug: |
| 14 | Removing bugs for maintainer-use scripts. We need not to care about those. |
| 15 | |
| 16 | -- |
| 17 | Rich |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Bug â„–504116, /etc/init.d/functions.sh | William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> |