Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: ML changes
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 01:05:28
Message-Id: f76iu0$j6u$
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] ML changes by Mike Doty
1 Mike Doty wrote:
2 > All-
3 >
4 > We're going to change the -dev mailing list from completely open to where only
5 > devs can post, but any dev could moderate a non-dev post. devs who moderate in
6 > bad posts will be subject to moderation themselves. in addition the
7 > gentoo-project list will be created to take over what -dev frequently becomes.
8 > there is no requirement to be on this new list.
9 >
10 > This will probably remove the need for -core(everything gets leaked out anyway)
11 > but that's a path to cross later.
12 >
13 > We're voting on this next council meeting so if you have input, now would be
14 > the time.
16 I heard a lot of good or interesting solutions for our ML "problems" but
17 this wasn't one of them. Why don't we create the gentoo-project mailing
18 list, and, you know, actually wait a bit to see how that actually goes.
19 Then we can talk about how best to handle -dev. One shit at a time,
20 people.
22 If you want to make -dev dev-only then fine, but drop the moderation
23 gimmick. People can post to -project or email privately and if a
24 developer thinks it's something everyone should see it they can simply
25 forward it.
28 --
29 dirtyepic salesman said this vacuum's guaranteed
30 gentoo org it could suck an ancient virus from the sea
31 9B81 6C9F E791 83BB 3AB3 5B2D E625 A073 8379 37E8 (0x837937E8)
33 --
34 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list


Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: ML changes Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>