| 1 |
Hello. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Jeffrey Forman wrote: |
| 4 |
> The upgrade for bugs.gentoo.org went exactly as I had planned for. |
| 5 |
> Completed in under 20 minutes, which included this email. I've upgraded |
| 6 |
> our Bugzilla from the old 2.18rc2 to 2.18.1. This fixes more security |
| 7 |
> and code than I can even begin to mention. I have cleaned out a lot of |
| 8 |
> the code and added in some nice features. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Sorry to bother you, but I was wondering what ppl think about the |
| 11 |
Advanced Query and "Step one: search for your bug." on the submittal |
| 12 |
form only searching open bugs. I don't believe this was the case before |
| 13 |
the upgrade, but i could just have noticed it now. Either way, having |
| 14 |
these search all bugs, open and closed, would seriously lessen the |
| 15 |
number of dupes IMO. especially on the submittal form, where there's no |
| 16 |
way to change the behaviour and no indication that only open bugs are |
| 17 |
being returned. for most users, that search is the only one they do (if |
| 18 |
they do one at all). even for people that do bother to do an actual |
| 19 |
query, the adv search screen is a nightmare behemoth of complexity for |
| 20 |
the avg user. defaults should be geared towards these types of people |
| 21 |
so they can get the most accurate information they can without needing |
| 22 |
to know what all the buttons do, and hopefully stop filing dupes. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
did i mention it would cut down on dupes? |
| 25 |
;) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
--de. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives