Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <hkBst@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-scheme/drscheme: ChangeLog reversion.patch drscheme-4.0.1.ebuild drscheme-0.372-r1.ebuild
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 10:31:05
Message-Id: 486CA885.4000806@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-scheme/drscheme: ChangeLog reversion.patch drscheme-4.0.1.ebuild drscheme-0.372-r1.ebuild by "Robin H. Johnson"
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
5 > On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 04:53:06PM +0000, Marijn Schouten (hkbst) wrote:
6 >> hkbst 08/06/28 16:53:06
7 >>
8 >> Modified: ChangeLog
9 >> Added: reversion.patch drscheme-4.0.1.ebuild
10 >> drscheme-0.372-r1.ebuild
11 >> Log:
12 >> add new major version 4.0.1 and reversion latest ~
13 >> (Portage version: 2.2_rc1/cvs/Linux 2.6.23-gentoo-r8 x86_64)
14 > ...
15 >> 1.1 dev-scheme/drscheme/reversion.patch
16 >> file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-scheme/drscheme/reversion.patch?rev=1.1&view=markup
17 >> plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-scheme/drscheme/reversion.patch?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain
18 > Why was reversion.patch committed directly to dev-scheme/drscheme
19 > instead of files/?
20 >
21
22 Because it is a patch I would've liked to apply to some ebuilds, not something
23 I'm applying to sources. The tools won't let me keep it uncommitted easily.
24
25 Marijn
26
27 - --
28 Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML
29 <http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-{lisp,ml} on FreeNode
30 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
31 Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
32 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
33
34 iEYEARECAAYFAkhsqIUACgkQp/VmCx0OL2xnGwCgwy1QiSruuSFBLHgw4aMHvMCD
35 gjwAn0oi7WAoTozSdprszabKgLmlugBJ
36 =Ywad
37 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
38 --
39 gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list

Replies