[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-scheme/drscheme: ChangeLog reversion.patch drscheme-4.0.1.ebuild drscheme-0.372-r1.ebuild

[Ryan Hill]

On Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:23:01 +0200
"Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <hkBst@g.o> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 04:53:06PM +0000, Marijn Schouten (hkbst)
> > wrote:
> >> hkbst       08/06/28 16:53:06
> >>
> >>   Modified:             ChangeLog
> >>   Added:                reversion.patch drscheme-4.0.1.ebuild
> >>                         drscheme-0.372-r1.ebuild
> >>   Log:
> >>   add new major version 4.0.1 and reversion latest ~
> >>   (Portage version: 2.2_rc1/cvs/Linux 2.6.23-gentoo-r8 x86_64)
> > ...
> >> 1.1                  dev-scheme/drscheme/reversion.patch
> >> file :
> >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-scheme/drscheme/reversion.patch?rev=1.1&view=markup
> >> plain:
> >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-scheme/drscheme/reversion.patch?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain
> > Why was reversion.patch committed directly to dev-scheme/drscheme
> > instead of files/?
> >
>
> Because it is a patch I would've liked to apply to some ebuilds, not
> something I'm applying to sources. The tools won't let me keep it
> uncommitted easily.

Then put it in an overlay or something?


-- 
gcc-porting,                                      by design, by neglect
treecleaner,                              for a fact or just for effect
wxwidgets @ gentoo     EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662