| 1 |
On Friday 14 September 2007, Hanno Böck wrote: |
| 2 |
> I noticed that the sqlite/sqlite3-useflags have no consistent meaning in |
| 3 |
> the tree. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> E.g. |
| 6 |
> - apr-util uses sqlite for sqlite-2.x support and sqlite3 for sqlite-3.x |
| 7 |
> support |
| 8 |
> - eix uses sqlite for sqlite-3.x support |
| 9 |
> Just the first examples I found, you can find countless for both of them in |
| 10 |
> the tree. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> We should imho decide if |
| 13 |
> a) sqlite means sqlite-2.x and sqlite3 means sqlite-3.x. |
| 14 |
> b) sqlite means enable sqlite-support always and sqlite+sqlite3 means if |
| 15 |
> both are available use sqlite-3.x instead of 2.x. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> I don't care which one (or a completely different one), but I think it |
| 18 |
> should be made clear. At least I think the current behaviour in the tree |
| 19 |
> doesn't really make sense. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
how about 'sqlite' means you want sqlite irregardless of version ... then |
| 22 |
sqlite-2 either gets punted from apr-util or it gets a local USE |
| 23 |
flag 'sqlite-old' for older cruft |
| 24 |
-mike |
Archives