1 |
On pon, 2017-04-10 at 15:21 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > It is always nice when a person who: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Please stop the sarcasm. While I understand the reaction, the idea in |
6 |
> itself does not seem totally crazy to me, and it seems useful to have |
7 |
> a discussion on its merits. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> At the same time, I would not consider it far-fetched to say that you |
10 |
> proposed significant changes to handling of manifest hashes, without |
11 |
> deep knowledge of the security aspects of the hashing algorithms up |
12 |
> for discussion. |
13 |
|
14 |
I'm not sure if you're trying to insult me or just make a random point. |
15 |
Even letting that pass by, I find quite a difference between not having |
16 |
a 'deep knowledge' of something, and not having a 'basic knowledge'. |
17 |
|
18 |
> This is sometimes how we learn. If you feel the thread |
19 |
> wastes time, you can just ignore it (as you seem to have done with the |
20 |
> manifest hashes thread after a few critical responses, somewhat to my |
21 |
> disappointment). |
22 |
|
23 |
Ignoring threads on thread that is mostly abandoned to terribly low |
24 |
level of posts frequently results in people putting their terrible ideas |
25 |
without even bothering to wait for a competent reply. |
26 |
|
27 |
As for that Manifest thread, I didn't notice any post that would request |
28 |
any reply. As far as I can see, it was mostly hijacked into 'why we |
29 |
still don't have proper verification, and why asking questions about it |
30 |
does not make it happen?!' |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Best regards, |
34 |
Michał Górny |