1 |
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:10:11 -0600 William Hubbs wrote: |
3 |
>> All, |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> I would like for us to discuss adding the sbin directories to PATH for |
6 |
>> all users. |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> The only reason I can think of that we have removed them is cosmetic (it |
9 |
>> removes things from tab completion), but I have also heard that having |
10 |
>> those things in tab completion would be a good thing. |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>> Another reason I am bringing this up is this bug [1]. On standard OSx, |
13 |
>> there is no reason to hard code the path to sysctl like I'm being asked |
14 |
>> to do in the patch associated with this bug, because the sbin |
15 |
>> directories are always in the path. In other words, it isn't worth the |
16 |
>> effort to send this patch upstream, which means there will always be a |
17 |
>> Gentoo-specific patch to dev-lang/go unless upstream finds another way |
18 |
>> to do the test they are doing on OSx via sysctl. |
19 |
>> |
20 |
>> Any ideas? |
21 |
> |
22 |
> +1. Just do it. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> I add /sbin and /usr/sbin in PATH on all Gentoo setups for ages. |
25 |
> Too many useful tools are there. Though, add them after /bin |
26 |
> and /usr/sbin for non-priviledged users and before for root. |
27 |
|
28 |
Swapping the order is silly and should be pointless. If we are |
29 |
installing different binaries with the same name in bin/sbin, that's a |
30 |
bug that needs fixing. |