Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: MAL <mal@×××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Cc: Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o>, tberman@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild question
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 15:08:32
Message-Id: 3ED773EE.7080705@komcept.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild question by Jon Portnoy
1 Jon Portnoy wrote:
2 > On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 10:40:09AM -0400, Todd Berman wrote:
3 >
4 >>Not to generate useless traffic, but I feel it is very important to
5 >>reiterate this.
6 >>
7 >>Please, please, please attach your ebuilds to bugzilla as text/plain and
8 >>as single files. Two common errors I have seen plenty are attaching a
9 >>.tar.gz or .tar.bz2, or, and more of a problem for me, are the text
10 >>files attached, but set as an octet stream so the viewer wont kick in.
11 >>
12 >>This cant be stressed enough as the 'proper' way to submit an ebuild if
13 >>you want to see it committed as fast as possible.
14 >>
15 >>And as an aside, maybe zhen or whoever maintains bugs.g.o can set
16 >>text/plain as the default file upload, because i assume plenty of people
17 >>just forget to change it.
18 >
19 > Just to throw in a "me too" - it drives me absolutely nuts when people
20 > don't submit ebuilds as plain text. Patches et al should also be plain
21 > text. It's much easier for me to review it that way and will definitely
22 > get your ebuild processed faster.
23
24 ok ok people.. if you look at the bug, you'll see that I submitted them
25 as text, and set the mime type too... I just then wondered if people
26 liked to see a .tar.bz2 _as well_
27
28 Has anyone actually looked at the ebuild yet? :p
29 It's my first submission and I'd like to know if I've gone about it the
30 right way, (in regards to updating the gtk2 input module cache).
31
32 Cheers ppl,
33 MAL
34
35
36 --
37 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list