| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:34:05 -0500 Andrew Muraco <tuxp3@×××××××××.com> |
| 3 |
> wrote: |
| 4 |
> | 2. What choices/options are on the table for this feature? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> The big controversy seems to be over whether repositories carry a |
| 7 |
> unique identifier string (for example, in metadata/repository_id) or |
| 8 |
> whether it's user-assigned. The former is clearly the more sensible |
| 9 |
> option, since it lets you do things like (syntax made up): |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> DEPEND=">=foo-bar/baz-2.1::ciaranmssekritrepo" |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> which would add a restriction that only packages in ciaranmssekritrepo |
| 14 |
> would be considered. This only works if the repository knows its own |
| 15 |
> identifier, however... |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Incidentally, the ::repo syntax (or whatever) would also be useful in |
| 18 |
> the world file, along with :slot. So something like: |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> foo-bar/baz:2::ciaranmssekritrepo |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> would tell the package manager that you want baz SLOT 2 from |
| 23 |
> ciaranmssekritrepo. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> *shrug* But it seems the Portage guys want repository names to be |
| 26 |
> user-assigned, which makes them far less useful. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
This functionality would come in very very handy. Would user assigned |
| 30 |
repository names be able to mimic this functionality somehow? |
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives