| 1 |
On 07/07/05, Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> I would be in favor of EAPI= or an even shorter variable name. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> strlen(EBUILD_FORMAT) * 19546 = 249K |
| 5 |
> strlen(EAPI) * 19546 = 77K |
| 6 |
> strlen(EV) * 19546 = 39K |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Where 19546 is the number if ebuilds in the tree as. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
If you're that interested in saving space on variable names, why not |
| 11 |
make an eclass called, say, a.eclass, that aliases all the existing |
| 12 |
'long' names (DESCRIPTION, SRC_URI, RDEPEND, DEPEND, IUSE, src_unpack, |
| 13 |
...) onto 'x', 'y', 'z' and so on? Yes, another eclass would make the |
| 14 |
tree slightly bigger, but you'd save that many times over once you |
| 15 |
changed a few hundred ebuilds to use it. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives