| 1 |
twofourtysix wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>On 07/07/05, Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>>I would be in favor of EAPI= or an even shorter variable name. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>>strlen(EBUILD_FORMAT) * 19546 = 249K |
| 9 |
>>strlen(EAPI) * 19546 = 77K |
| 10 |
>>strlen(EV) * 19546 = 39K |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>>Where 19546 is the number if ebuilds in the tree as. |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
<sarcasm> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
>If you're that interested in saving space on variable names, why not |
| 21 |
>make an eclass called, say, a.eclass, that aliases all the existing |
| 22 |
>'long' names (DESCRIPTION, SRC_URI, RDEPEND, DEPEND, IUSE, src_unpack, |
| 23 |
>...) onto 'x', 'y', 'z' and so on? Yes, another eclass would make the |
| 24 |
>tree slightly bigger, but you'd save that many times over once you |
| 25 |
>changed a few hundred ebuilds to use it. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
</sarcasm> |
| 30 |
<file:///H:/Satish/Desktop/> |
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives