1 |
begin quote |
2 |
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 16:18:12 +0100 |
3 |
Markus Nigbur <pYrania@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
> > So it would be helpful and sufficient if I use the unstable ~x86 |
7 |
> > tree and report any bug and strange behavior? |
8 |
|
9 |
> |
10 |
> I wouldn't say ~arch ist unstable, more like testing. |
11 |
|
12 |
It -should- be testing, testing of builds. Unstable software (that |
13 |
noone would think to call "stable" x86/alpha/mips/whatnot shouldn't |
14 |
appear in ~arch either. |
15 |
|
16 |
If there are developers out there who think that "its only ~arch, lets |
17 |
put it in and never mask it stable" they should have a long long talk |
18 |
with me, and a few others. Including policy documentation and sane |
19 |
practices. |
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
*Coughs* |
23 |
|
24 |
//Spider |
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
begin .signature |
29 |
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! |
30 |
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. |
31 |
end |