Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge -C eselect-python disaster
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:04:09
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge -C eselect-python disaster by "Arttu V."
Arttu V. wrote:
> On 1/24/10, Benny Pedersen <me@××××.org> wrote: > >> should not be marked as system ? >> >> it removes python-wrapper and this remove python link from >> /usr/bin/python linked to /usr/bin/python-wrapper so all portage does >> not work after this, but i solved it with a quickpkg from another host >> >> my dump question why is it not listed as a system pkg when it really >> seems so important ? >> > > Nearly identical question was mulled over in a discussion last spring > over at gentoo-user list. Scan for "ARGH I uninstalled python" in the > archives if you are interested. > > IIRC there was a suggestion to make the system set dynamically grow to > contain all of the required dependencies of the packages explicitly > listed in the system set, but I'm not sure if it went anywhere. > > Anyways, the current contents of @system cause all kinds of surprises, > for example to FEATURES="buildsyspkg" users who rely on the feature > without realizing how small (and even "incomplete") @system actually > is. > >
I just picked a random reply here. My $0.02 worth. If I try to remove portage itself, I get this: root@smoker / # emerge -Ca portage >>> These are the packages that would be unmerged: * Not unmerging package sys-apps/portage-2.2_rc61 since there is no valid * reason for portage to unmerge itself. >>> No packages selected for removal by unmerge root@smoker / # It appears you can't even remove portage at all. Now call me silly, couldn't it be said that removing something that would prevent the package manager from working constitute a little warning? After all, most likely the person is not thinking clearly that day and most likely doesn't REALLY want to do this. Is there not a way to at the very least post a warning and then ask a 'are you sure' question like it does with the -a option? It's just that as a newbie ages ago, I did this too. I didn't realize that it was a nasty boo boo until afterwards. < dale crawls back under his rock > Dale :-) :-)