| 1 |
Doug Goldstein wrote: |
| 2 |
> I still stand by my original feeling that we'd better the community NOT |
| 3 |
> only the developers doing the commits by updating the devmanual, which |
| 4 |
> is accessible to all developers and all users in the Gentoo community. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
This would be a great thing, but I'm under the impression that it's |
| 7 |
somewhat difficult to get changes made to the devmanual for various |
| 8 |
reasons. That said I've never actually tried so I'm probably talking |
| 9 |
out my ass. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> The commits review is flawed because if we're not documenting this stuff |
| 12 |
> in one central place, then when new developers join. The same lessons |
| 13 |
> have to be learned over and over again. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I think the review work is already very useful. However I do agree that |
| 16 |
actually documenting this stuff would be even more useful. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> Then again, this depends on the QA guys actually doing something about |
| 19 |
> the outstanding bugs. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
This would not be the least of the various reasons. ;P |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
fonts / wxWindows / gcc-porting / treecleaners |
| 26 |
EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 (0xF9A40662) |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives