| 1 |
>>>>> On Mon, 23 Sep 2013, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Because I've seen some commits today for reverting the mentioned |
| 4 |
> KEYWORDS to ~arch in some ebuilds I'm not sure if everyone is aware that |
| 5 |
> the arch status is set using profiles/profiles.desc and as I'm writing |
| 6 |
> this, the mentioned arches are still 'stable', not 'dev' |
| 7 |
> No matter what the news item or whatever says, only profiles.desc counts |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
That's a thing that was never quite clear to me. Should there be |
| 10 |
a one-to-one correspondence between an arch marked stable in |
| 11 |
profiles.desc (i.e. having at least one profile labelled as stable |
| 12 |
there) and the same arch having stable keywords? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
There is at least one example for an arch that is only dev in |
| 15 |
profiles.desc but used to have stable keywords (sh), and another arch |
| 16 |
where it's the other way around (amd64-fbsd). |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Ulrich |
Archives