| 1 |
On 23/09/2013 22:52, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 2 |
>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Sep 2013, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Because I've seen some commits today for reverting the mentioned |
| 5 |
>> KEYWORDS to ~arch in some ebuilds I'm not sure if everyone is aware that |
| 6 |
>> the arch status is set using profiles/profiles.desc and as I'm writing |
| 7 |
>> this, the mentioned arches are still 'stable', not 'dev' |
| 8 |
>> No matter what the news item or whatever says, only profiles.desc counts |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> That's a thing that was never quite clear to me. Should there be |
| 11 |
> a one-to-one correspondence between an arch marked stable in |
| 12 |
> profiles.desc (i.e. having at least one profile labelled as stable |
| 13 |
> there) and the same arch having stable keywords? |
| 14 |
In my opinion the two need not be linked. To me "profile stability" |
| 15 |
refers to the status of the profile, nothing to do with keywords. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
If an arch team does not want to maintain stable keywords, but wants to |
| 18 |
indicate that a particular profile is stable, why should we try to stop |
| 19 |
them? |
Archives