| 1 |
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
>> That's a thing that was never quite clear to me. Should there be |
| 3 |
>> a one-to-one correspondence between an arch marked stable in |
| 4 |
>> profiles.desc (i.e. having at least one profile labelled as stable |
| 5 |
>> there) and the same arch having stable keywords? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> In my opinion the two need not be linked. To me "profile stability" refers |
| 8 |
> to the status of the profile, nothing to do with keywords. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> If an arch team does not want to maintain stable keywords, but wants to |
| 11 |
> indicate that a particular profile is stable, why should we try to stop |
| 12 |
> them? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
What does eshowkw use to determine what arches should be displayed? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Cheers, |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Dirkjan |
Archives