| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Mon, 2004-05-03 at 23:27, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
> On Mon, 03 May 2004 23:13:07 +0200 foser <foser@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> | > Also of note, if upstream rejects your |
| 6 |
> | > patch, you'll end up maintaining it for life, updating as often as |
| 7 |
> | > upstream moves a few things in their own menu code. |
| 8 |
> The Fluxbox people are basically saying they're only interested if it |
| 9 |
> doesn't introduce another major dependency. One of the ideas behind the |
| 10 |
> lightweight WMs is that they don't require everything-plus-kitchen-sink. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
The people who want minimal window managers probably are not interested |
| 13 |
in large auto-generated easy to use menus that include every apps |
| 14 |
installed. If the upstream providers are not interested in having their |
| 15 |
WM support the freedesktop standard so be it, they wont have nice menus. |
| 16 |
Lets not become debian on that front. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Olivier Crête |
| 20 |
tester@g.o |
| 21 |
Gentoo Developer |
Archives