| 1 |
On Thursday 10 May 2007, Doug Goldstein wrote: |
| 2 |
> Thilo Bangert wrote: |
| 3 |
> > All packages with <herd>maintainer-needed</herd> will be moved to |
| 4 |
> > <herd>no-herd</herd>. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> maintainer-needed is different from no-herd. no-herd is valid when a dev |
| 7 |
> is maintaining a pkg outside of a herd. no-herd is not valid for when |
| 8 |
> the package is entirely unmaintained, maintainer-needed would be a |
| 9 |
> better tag for it. I would not make that change. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
i think your examples can be attained with [pseudo-xml]: |
| 12 |
<herd>no-herd</herd> |
| 13 |
<maintainer>maintainer-needed@g.o</maintainer> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
<herd>no-herd</herd> |
| 16 |
<maintainer>cardoe@g.o</maintainer> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
there is no ambiguity here ... |
| 19 |
-mike |
Archives