| 1 |
Thilo Bangert wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi everybody, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> the following list of packages uses a invalid <herd> tag in its |
| 5 |
> metadata.xml. Invalid in the sense of 'could-not-be-found-in-herds.xml' |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Most of them appear to be simple mis-spellings or minor misunderstandings. |
| 8 |
> Others may lack an entry in herds.xml (s390?). |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> AFAICT most packages have straight forward fixes, which will be applied in |
| 11 |
> about 24 hours. Beat me to it if you want or stop my insanity by speaking |
| 12 |
> up. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> All packages with <herd>maintainer-needed</herd> will be moved to |
| 15 |
> <herd>no-herd</herd>. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> kind regards |
| 18 |
> Thilo |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
maintainer-needed is different from no-herd. no-herd is valid when a dev |
| 21 |
is maintaining a pkg outside of a herd. no-herd is not valid for when |
| 22 |
the package is entirely unmaintained, maintainer-needed would be a |
| 23 |
better tag for it. I would not make that change. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I tried to fix up your list and found a handful of the packages not even |
| 26 |
in existence in the tree. Can you re-run this with a fully up to date tree? |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives