Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Francesco Riosa <vivo@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 07:48:10
Message-Id: 4545AE99.7090004@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees by Jason Wever
1 Jason Wever ha scritto:
2 > Hi All,
3 >
4 > Apparently its been too long since I've sent one of these out, as people
5 > are starting to slip up and break the tree again.
6 >
7 > Please triple check what you want to commit and verify that you don't do
8 > any of the following (which are punishable by death):
9 >
10 > 1) remove the last ebuild that is keyworded for a given arch, especially
11 > when resulting in broken dependencies.
12
13 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149626
14 I'm going to die then, scheduled on 2006-11-05
15 If keywording without archs support is only gambling I'll go that route
16
17 > 2) remove the last stable ebuild for an architecture
18 >
19 > 3) remove the last testing ebuild for an architecture when there is no
20 > stable ebuild available after the removal
21 >
22 > Consider yourself warned. Violation of any of these will cause the
23 > jforman death goat squad to be dispatched to your location for a
24 > discreet hit. For repeat offenders, public executions will be had, with
25 > Spanky hosting.
26 >
27 > Thanks :)
28 > -- Jason Wever
29 > Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
30 --
31 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees Francesco Riosa <vivo@g.o>