Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Francesco Riosa <vivo@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 00:37:35
Message-Id: 4547EBB9.9070205@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees by Francesco Riosa
1 Francesco Riosa ha scritto:
2 [...]
3 >
4 > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149626
5 > I'm going to die then, scheduled on 2006-11-05
6 > If keywording without archs support is only gambling I'll go that route
7 >
8 [...]
9 Worried that this can cause a flameware I already updated the ebuild:
10 - it now use the eclass
11 - the only stable keywords now are those of the arch not having a better
12 version
13
14 please don't tell anyone, I'm really worried it can cause a flamefest.
15
16 in the meantime the "~sparc-fbsd" keyword reached the package, very
17 happy for that :) but I've keyworded DBI and DBD (perl stuff) to satisfy
18 the deps. Repoman was stil complaining about missin KEY on
19 '>=perl-core/Sys-Syslog-0.17' '>=dev-perl/PlRPC-0.2' on dev-perl/DBI
20
21
22 ciao,
23 Francesco
24 --
25 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list