| 1 |
Sorry for being completely OT now, will be the only mail on this from my |
| 2 |
side... |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Thursday, 13. October 2011 18:05:47 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:14:31 -0400 |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Olivier Crête <tester@g.o> wrote: |
| 8 |
> > On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 18:49 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 9 |
> > > On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:00:23 +0530 |
| 10 |
> > > |
| 11 |
> > > Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o> wrote: |
| 12 |
> > > > Then please continue with udev in package.mask and kindly stop |
| 13 |
> > > > trying to impose your workflow on the rest of the world. |
| 14 |
> > > |
| 15 |
> > > Isn't the point here that the desktop / GNOME OS guys are trying to |
| 16 |
> > > impose their deep integration, tight coupling workflow upon the |
| 17 |
> > > rest of the world? |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > We're imposing our deep integration because it's the only way to make |
| 20 |
> > a compelling platform that "just works", forcing users to tell the |
| 21 |
> > computer something the computer already knows is just plain lazy and |
| 22 |
> > stupid. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> The problem with a platform that "just works" is that when it doesn't |
| 25 |
> work, no-one knows how to fix it. That's what's happened here: the deep |
| 26 |
> integration doesn't work in the common case that /usr is on its own |
| 27 |
> filesystem, but because of all the excessive coupling you're unable to |
| 28 |
> fix it and so are trying to pass the blame elsewhere. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> The first step in fixing it is to decouple all of the horrible mess |
| 31 |
> that has been making its way into the base system over the past couple |
| 32 |
> of years. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
in what way will exherbo deal wih this mess? Are there any plans? |
| 35 |
Feel free to mail me privately and/or answer this on the user-ML, I think some |
| 36 |
of us are quite interested. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Thanks, |
| 39 |
Michael |
Archives