1 |
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:14:31 -0400 |
2 |
Olivier Crête <tester@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 18:49 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
5 |
> > On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:00:23 +0530 |
6 |
> > Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o> wrote: |
7 |
> > > Then please continue with udev in package.mask and kindly stop |
8 |
> > > trying to impose your workflow on the rest of the world. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > Isn't the point here that the desktop / GNOME OS guys are trying to |
11 |
> > impose their deep integration, tight coupling workflow upon the |
12 |
> > rest of the world? |
13 |
> |
14 |
> We're imposing our deep integration because it's the only way to make |
15 |
> a compelling platform that "just works", forcing users to tell the |
16 |
> computer something the computer already knows is just plain lazy and |
17 |
> stupid. |
18 |
|
19 |
The problem with a platform that "just works" is that when it doesn't |
20 |
work, no-one knows how to fix it. That's what's happened here: the deep |
21 |
integration doesn't work in the common case that /usr is on its own |
22 |
filesystem, but because of all the excessive coupling you're unable to |
23 |
fix it and so are trying to pass the blame elsewhere. |
24 |
|
25 |
The first step in fixing it is to decouple all of the horrible mess |
26 |
that has been making its way into the base system over the past couple |
27 |
of years. |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
Ciaran McCreesh |