Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Olivier Crête" <tester@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion for getting rid of udev
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:15:10
Message-Id: 1318518871.3885.3.camel@TesterBox.tester.ca
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion for getting rid of udev by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 18:49 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:00:23 +0530
3 > Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o> wrote:
4 > > Then please continue with udev in package.mask and kindly stop trying
5 > > to impose your workflow on the rest of the world.
6 >
7 > Isn't the point here that the desktop / GNOME OS guys are trying to
8 > impose their deep integration, tight coupling workflow upon the rest of
9 > the world?
10
11 We're imposing our deep integration because it's the only way to make a
12 compelling platform that "just works", forcing users to tell the
13 computer something the computer already knows is just plain lazy and
14 stupid.
15
16 --
17 Olivier Crête
18 tester@g.o
19 Gentoo Developer

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion for getting rid of udev Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion for getting rid of udev Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion for getting rid of udev Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org>