| 1 |
I didn't get it :) |
| 2 |
I'm one person, Anton Starikov and Antst :) antst - just my mailbox :)) |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
So, /etc/portage/packages.env/ seems to be good. That sound cleaner, |
| 5 |
right. But, can you imaging, I'm going to edit 10 files next time, when |
| 6 |
to ICC, for example, will be added some nice optimization flag which I'm |
| 7 |
going to use. |
| 8 |
So, the basic point is that they are really "per-package" sollution. If |
| 9 |
we want to keep it. I guess it can be extended, to have directories like |
| 10 |
/etc/portage/packages.env/bash/ |
| 11 |
Where you can put multiple files similar to /etc/env.d/ |
| 12 |
So, you can make one env file, and make just symbolic links to it for |
| 13 |
different packages. |
| 14 |
So, idea to include some kind of sollution which not strictly |
| 15 |
"per-package". So, you can define something, and easy include/exclude it |
| 16 |
for different packages. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 20 |
> On Tuesday 31 August 2004 06:26 pm, Antst GD wrote: |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
>>For the moment both solutions looks ugly for me. At least I can't |
| 23 |
>>imaging simple and easy-to-understand syntax for package.env, which will |
| 24 |
>>look nice and will parce without problems. |
| 25 |
>> |
| 26 |
>>What do you think about? |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> most of what you proposed seems excessive and confusing (and like you say, |
| 30 |
> ugly) ... a cleaner/simpler solution can be taken from your work though i |
| 31 |
> think ... |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> we have a directory: |
| 34 |
> /etc/profile/packages.env/ |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> in this directory we have simple bash (bash because we can just source it and |
| 37 |
> be done with it) files which line up in a similar fashion to the portage |
| 38 |
> tree ... for example, if i want an env file for bash, i would have: |
| 39 |
> /etc/profile/packages.env/app-shells/bash |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
> i think this is about all we need ... and like Antst pointed out, this looks |
| 42 |
> like it'd be real simple to implement ... |
| 43 |
> -mike |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
-- |
| 47 |
Anton Starikov |
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
-- |
| 50 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives