1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
2 |
Hash: SHA1
|
3 |
|
4 |
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 18:59:48 +0200
|
5 |
hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote:
|
6 |
> On 06/12/2013 06:51 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > Teams, what are the main reasons for keeping that much stuff in |
9 |
> > overlays? |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> |
12 |
> It's a mix of easier workflow especially for contributors and less |
13 |
> responsibility/noise in case of bugs. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> If there is a bug in an overlay, you rather expect people to come up |
16 |
> with a pull request. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Herds relying heavily on overlays and their portage packages being far |
19 |
> behind their overlay is just a prove that the herd is dying and needs |
20 |
> assistance. That goes especially for science. |
21 |
|
22 |
Isn't it more an indication that Gentoo needs better package management
|
23 |
support for overlays?
|
24 |
|
25 |
- --
|
26 |
Ciaran McCreesh
|
27 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
28 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)
|
29 |
|
30 |
iEYEARECAAYFAlG4qcIACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGkvQCeOCoIQfdBLNifJxQpGmC0UOrO
|
31 |
yZ8An0LmIV8S8AjIaSU5IVDeHa4RuysV
|
32 |
=8keM
|
33 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |