Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Over-reliance of Gentoo projects on overlays
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 17:03:15
Message-Id: 20130612180255.59f313b3@googlemail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Over-reliance of Gentoo projects on overlays by hasufell
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 18:59:48 +0200
5 hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote:
6 > On 06/12/2013 06:51 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
7 > >
8 > > Teams, what are the main reasons for keeping that much stuff in
9 > > overlays?
10 > >
11 >
12 > It's a mix of easier workflow especially for contributors and less
13 > responsibility/noise in case of bugs.
14 >
15 > If there is a bug in an overlay, you rather expect people to come up
16 > with a pull request.
17 >
18 > Herds relying heavily on overlays and their portage packages being far
19 > behind their overlay is just a prove that the herd is dying and needs
20 > assistance. That goes especially for science.
21
22 Isn't it more an indication that Gentoo needs better package management
23 support for overlays?
24
25 - --
26 Ciaran McCreesh
27 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
28 Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)
29
30 iEYEARECAAYFAlG4qcIACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGkvQCeOCoIQfdBLNifJxQpGmC0UOrO
31 yZ8An0LmIV8S8AjIaSU5IVDeHa4RuysV
32 =8keM
33 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Over-reliance of Gentoo projects on overlays hasufell <hasufell@g.o>