1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 06/12/2013 07:02 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
5 |
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 18:59:48 +0200 hasufell <hasufell@g.o> |
6 |
> wrote: |
7 |
>> On 06/12/2013 06:51 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>>> Teams, what are the main reasons for keeping that much stuff |
10 |
>>> in overlays? |
11 |
>>> |
12 |
> |
13 |
>> It's a mix of easier workflow especially for contributors and |
14 |
>> less responsibility/noise in case of bugs. |
15 |
> |
16 |
>> If there is a bug in an overlay, you rather expect people to come |
17 |
>> up with a pull request. |
18 |
> |
19 |
>> Herds relying heavily on overlays and their portage packages |
20 |
>> being far behind their overlay is just a prove that the herd is |
21 |
>> dying and needs assistance. That goes especially for science. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Isn't it more an indication that Gentoo needs better package |
24 |
> management support for overlays? |
25 |
> |
26 |
> |
27 |
|
28 |
No. |
29 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
30 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) |
31 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
32 |
|
33 |
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRuKpZAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWza5EH/3Oc6ytKY9jH88DSWKO+WIeW |
34 |
eXv49f0SL2+VOGdpZ7as4rZSTNBktCsLAuug05F+iQyCOhXBQkYYetLJPEt6W7Fa |
35 |
LSMFFov2/jdGLIN1WhNzCHpjpvKs2vx5A28jcm/Iz6liYkSYw4jbd1MP0gb0pKBT |
36 |
8oaUNL3KVQGhPJekEF+9+W/akeXoy5cCGUbngWghZtAhAN3k/H+QRsmToaq1/yK8 |
37 |
BnrHv9UXnh88k3KbAhrvfNjce8Oom6/Gf3XS7MjBxnQM323CbrZzoj0fJL6czvLa |
38 |
safA3gaVSTkK+FGmaz9oZv+hqmNUG1wWa020jt/UP88zVuQZoRr3y6yS9fDVKUo= |
39 |
=en4R |
40 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |