From: | "Aaron W. Swenson" <titanofold@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] New policy: 'files' directory must not be larger than 32 KiB | ||
Date: | Tue, 19 Dec 2017 21:00:26 | ||
Message-Id: | 20171219210016.GA18804@gengoff.grandmasfridge.local | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] [QA] New policy: 'files' directory must not be larger than 32 KiB by "Michał Górny" |
1 | On 2017-12-17 14:21, Michał Górny wrote: |
2 | > Total size of 'files' subdirectory of a package should not be larger |
3 | > than 32 KiB. If the package needs more auxiliary files, they should |
4 | > be put into SRC_URI e.g. via tarballs. |
5 | |
6 | I don’t have any strong opinions about this either way. |
7 | |
8 | However, what alternative do we have to throwing the patches up in a |
9 | devspace? |
10 | |
11 | Having previously done so with dev-db/postgresql, it was annoying having |
12 | to fix the SRC_URI because I wasn’t the one who did a slot bump. |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] New policy: 'files' directory must not be larger than 32 KiB | Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> |